How many Mexicans have AIDS

How many Mexicans have hiv or aids

http://www.chacha.com/question/how-many-mexicans-have-hiv-or-aids

The estimated number of people living with HIV/AIDS in Mexico, by the end of 2007 is 200,000! Thanks for using ChaCha!

How did the New Mexico AIDS InfoNet begin?

http://www.thebody.com/content/art32016.html

Within New Mexico the HIV/AIDS services are organized in a managed-care type of model. There are four primary agencies that serve the entire state. So if we could make sure that those four agencies (and particularly the case managers of tho…

What does Mexican AIDS mean?

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Mexican%20AIDS

Another word to use inplace of Swine flu.

Related Questions Answered on Y!Answers

Would more humane immigration laws in the US mean less illegal immigrants?

Q: CAUTION: Before answering, please think for at least 90 seconds. I don’t want sound bites and I don’t want sourceless claims (ie, “More immigrants means more poor people which means more taxpayer dollars going toward welfare. Our economy can’t take that!” — how MANY more taxpayer dollars? In numbers, how BIG of an impact would that have on our economy?).According to Canada’s statistics database, it takes approx. 180 days to immigrate to Canada. According to England’s counterpart database, it takes on average 6 months to immigrate there. According to New Zealand’s Immigration Services webpage, immigration to NZ takes 6-9 months. The US doesn’t publish straightforward immigration statistics. But according to the website, the waiting list for Mexico, India and the Philippines is 21-25 years. After that, a prospective immigrant must learn English, pay thousands of dollars in lawyers’ fees, wait at least 7 more years, and pass a US history test that most natural-born US high schoolers can’t pass. His/her application is then at the discretion of immigration officers. There are plenty of very good people in very bad situations who simply can’t afford that kind of investment (and by can’t afford, I mean they’d literally DIE while waiting to be legally naturalized). Maybe, just maybe, if we made this process a bit more realistic instead of building more walls, we’d be able to aid many needy people without criminalizing them.And yes, there are some arguments against making immigration laws in the US more humane:1) Those people should work to change their own governments and improve the quality of life in their own countries.This argument is naive because it assumes that poor, oppressed individuals who live in absolutely desolate conditions can put together a militia and overthrow their often wealthy, corrupt government without starving to death or being shot down by a more powerful government army. Sure, this is not ALWAYS the exact case in third world nations, but there are always SOME factors stopping the oppressed from having any political influence in their respective nations.2) We already have too many people in the US.This is not true. According to the CIA World Factbook, the US has the 180th largest population density out of 241 countries.3) Many Mexican immigrants are just criminals.According to the Minnesota Human Rights Group, whose data is used in public middle school curricula, less than one percent of illegal Mexican immigrants will go on to commit any other crime in the US.A translated quote from the song Frijolero by Mexican band Molotov:”From the outside, it’s easy to imagine being a Mexican crossing the border, thinking of your family while you cross, and leaving everything you know behind. If YOU had to escape from under the heals of a few elite gringo ranchers, would you keep calling me a good-for-nothing wetback? If it was YOU who had to start from zero.”

A: To answer your question: Yes. Which is why no politician will ever make it easier for immigrants to legally immigrate. Our entire economy would collapse if all the illegals here were suddenly granted citizenship. We make far, far too much money by keeping them illegal. People do not realize, for instance, that illegal immigrants pay over $7 billion a year into Social Security through means of fake SS cards that their employers – big American corporations – supply for them, requiring them to withhold that money from their paychecks, which they will never be able to collect.

Making it really hard to immigrate to the US is just mean! =( Don’t you think?

Q: CAUTION: Before answering, please think for at least 90 seconds. I don’t want sound bites and I don’t want sourceless claims (ie, “More immigrants means more poor people which means more taxpayer dollars going toward welfare. Our economy can’t take that!” — how MANY more taxpayer dollars? In numbers, how BIG of an impact would that have on our economy?).According to Canada’s statistics database, it takes approx. 180 days to immigrate to Canada. According to England’s counterpart database, it takes on average 6 months to immigrate there. According to New Zealand’s Immigration Services webpage, immigration to NZ takes 6-9 months. The US doesn’t publish straightforward immigration statistics. But according to the website, the waiting list for Mexico, India and the Philippines is 21-25 years. After that, a prospective immigrant must learn English, pay thousands of dollars in lawyers’ fees, wait at least 7 more years, and pass a US history test that most natural-born US high schoolers can’t pass. His/her application is then at the discretion of immigration officers. There are plenty of very good people in very bad situations who simply can’t afford that kind of investment (and by can’t afford, I mean they’d literally DIE while waiting to be legally naturalized). Maybe, just maybe, if we made this process a bit more realistic instead of building more walls, we’d be able to aid many needy people without criminalizing them.And yes, there are some arguments against making immigration laws in the US more humane:1) Those people should work to change their own governments and improve the quality of life in their own countries.This argument is naive because it assumes that poor, oppressed individuals who live in absolutely desolate conditions can put together a militia and overthrow their often wealthy, corrupt government without starving to death or being shot down by a more powerful government army. Sure, this is not ALWAYS the exact case in third world nations, but there are always SOME factors stopping the oppressed from having any political influence in their respective nations.2) We already have too many people in the US.This is not true. According to the CIA World Factbook, the US has the 180th largest population density out of 241 countries.3) Many Mexican immigrants are just criminals.According to the Minnesota Human Rights Group, whose data is used in public middle school curricula, less than one percent of illegal Mexican immigrants will go on to commit any other crime in the US.A translated quote from the song Frijolero by Mexican band Molotov:”From the outside, it’s easy to imagine being a Mexican crossing the border, thinking of your family while you cross, and leaving everything you know behind. If YOU had to escape from under the heals of a few elite gringo ranchers, would you keep calling me a good-for-nothing *******? If it was YOU who had to start from zero.”Well Lid, can you tell me what is best and why?

A: We cant let everybody in. – In case you missed it we have over 6% unemployment with many places much higher. Where are these people going to work?- Our lax standards made it easy for terrorists and criminals to to immigrate legally. We don’t need any more of that 9/11 stuff or train bombings like England and Spain.- Have to learn English? Thats a shame that we should require you to learn our language instead of everybody here learning yours.- Yeah it costs money. It costs money to make sure you can be productive when you get here and aren’t a criminal.

Is this why so many of you are happy with Obama?

Q: If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved?If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the non-existent “Austrian language,” would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current on their income taxes, would you have approved?If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to “Cinco de Cuatro” in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the fourth of May (Cuatro de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?If George W. Bush had mis-spelled the word advice would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as “proof” of what a dunce he is?If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on “Earth Day”, would you have concluded he’s a hypocrite?If George W. Bush’s administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually “get” what happened on 9-11?If George W. Bush h ad been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans , would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?If George W. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved?If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again 10 times within years, would you have approved?If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan’s holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can’t think of anything? Don’t worry. He’s done all this in 5 months — so you’ll have three years and seven months to come up with an answer.

A: I know that you, the question asker, are a fair and balanced person with an intelligent mind. Please make a list that is equally long about George W. Bush.Thanks for your help and I am looking forward to your list.Obama 2012!!