Is it possible for someone to think themselves to death

Health related question in topics Language Lookup .We found some answers as below for this question “Is it possible for someone to think themselves to death”,you can compare them.

There is a rare disease called Fatal Familial Insomnia, where the patient is unable to rest their brain because it is impossible to sleep. They usually live 7-36 months.The disease in untreatable and sleeping pills and things like that make is worse. [ Source: http://www.chacha.com/question/is-it-possible-for-someone-to-think-themselves-to-death ]
More Answers to “Is it possible for someone to think themselves to death
Is it possible for someone to think themselves to death
http://chacha.com/question/is-it-possible-for-someone-to-think-themselves-to-death
There is a rare disease called Fatal Familial Insomnia, where the patient is unable to rest their brain because it is impossible to sleep. They usually live 7-36 months.The disease in untreatable and sleeping pills and things like that make…

Related Questions Answered on Y!Answers

Can someone read my essay and tell me what they think of it?
Q: I think i jumped around a little, and its not that consistent, but im not sure. It would also help if you had background info on “The Lottery.” BE as honest as possible. I know it’s long but i just really need help. Thanks!Most Americans are familiar with the classic horror story, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley. However, only few have heard of another classic, “The Lottery”, created from the mind of Shirley Jackson. This short story paints a picture of the exact opposite of what truly happens. It is very misleading from the beginning of the story, almost to the very end. Although “The Lottery” may not be considered as an actual horror story by some, Jackson creates a sense of horror with the use of withheld knowledge, irony and characterization. The use of withheld knowledge is utilized in many novels such as A Northern Light as well as others. Jackson uses her withheld knowledge by not letting her readers know what happens after Tessie dies. “’It isn’t fair, it isn’t right’, Mrs. Hutchinson screamed, ‘and they were upon her.’” (Jackson 565). Shirley Jackson does not even go into detail about her death or how it actually happened. More importantly, she does not explain how life goes on in the community. This leaves the reader pondering and frightened because they fear for Tessie’s well being. They also fear for the fact that the community goes on as normal, not as if their neighbor was killed by them.Similarly, Irony plays an important role in creating a sense of in the story, The two men who administer the lottery have very symbolic and ironic names. “The lottery was conducted… by Mr. Summers… he was a round-faced jovial man… The post master, Mr. Graves, followed him.” (Jackson 557). Mr. Summers, as it says, is an enjoyable, on-cloud-nine kind of fellow. His name, Summers, is supposed to bring warmth and fun to one’s mind, as summer is. Ironically, Mr. Summers does not bring warmth, instead he generates the exact opposite, death. He is the conductor of something horrific, when his personality is completely reverse. Mr. Graves, his companion, gives you a clue as to what will essentially happen. Symbolically, his name represents what the lottery is, serious. Ironically, none of the residents of the community act that way, they act as it is a normal day. Readers are shocked at the irony in the names of the two men, and wonder how someone could possibly produce something this horrific.Furthermore, Tessie’s characterization fills the readers’ mind with a sense of horror. She appears in the square as though it is any other day, then when she is chosen to be sacrificed, her mind quickly changes. “Wouldn’t have me leave m’dishes in the sink, now, would you, Joe?… You didn’t give him enough time to take any paper he wanted. I saw you. It wasn’t fair!” (Jackson 559,563). She continues to beg and complaint that it wasn’t fair, and that it isn’t right. Even her friends and neighbors get so aggravated with her that they go on to say, “Be a good sport, Tessie… All of us took the same chance.” (Jackson 562), despite the fact that they themselves will kill her in a few moments. Her late arrival is also what Jackson uses to foreshadow that she will be the one sacrificed later on. Tessie’s mood is the only mood that changes from an “everyday” mood to a “life changing” mood. This makes the reader feel as though no one cares for Tessie, as it creates a sense of horror as well.In conclusion, more and more readers will begin to recognize “The Lottery” as a horror story. It has a contradicting plot that leave a reader horrified and shocked in the end. literary devices such as withheld knowledge, irony, and characterization play a big role in creating a sense of horror in Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery.”
A: I hated “The Lottery,” i had to read it my sophomore year of high school for AP ENG11.the lottery has a complex plot, so you may want to start off with a paragraph summarizing, since most people haven’t read this.”Although “The Lottery” may not be considered as an actual horror story by some, Jackson creates a sense of horror with the use of withheld knowledge, irony, and characterization.” *you may want to include what type of irony and characterization.The use of withheld knowledge (is utilized) *passive voice, change to “Authors use withheld knowledge….”* in many novels, such as A Northern Light. Jackson uses withheld knowledge by not letting her readers know what happens after Tessie dies. “’Isn’t fair, it isn’t right’, Mrs. Hutchinson screamed, ‘and they were upon her.’” (Jackson 565). Shirley Jackson does not even go into detail about her death or how it actually happened. More importantly, she does not explain how life goes on in the community. This leaves the reader pondering and frightened because they fear for Tessie’s well being. They also fear because the community goes on the same as usual, as if they did not acknowledge the fact that they killed their neighbor.Similarly *to what*, irony plays an important role in creating a sense *sense of what* of in the story, The two men who administer the lottery have very symbolic and ironic names. “The lottery was conducted… by Mr. Summers… he was a round-faced jovial man… The post master, Mr. Graves, followed him.” (Jackson 557). Mr. Summers, as it says, is an enjoyable, on-cloud-nine kind of fellow. His name, Summers, is supposed to bring warmth and fun to one’s mind, as summer usually does. Ironically, Mr. Summers does not bring warmth, instead he generates the exact opposite, death. He is the conductor of something horrific, when his personality is completely reverse. Mr. Graves, his companion, gives you a clue as to what will essentially happen. Symbolically, his name represents what the lottery is, serious. Ironically, none of the residents of the community act that way* what way*; they act as if it is a normal day. Readers are shocked at the irony in the names of the two men, and wonder how someone could possibly produce something this horrific.Furthermore, Tessie’s characterization fills the readers’ mind with a sense of horror. She appears in the square as though it is any other day, then when she is chosen to be sacrificed, her mind quickly changes. “Wouldn’t have me leave m’dishes in the sink, now, would you, Joe?… You didn’t give him enough time to take any paper he wanted. I saw you. It wasn’t fair!” (Jackson 559,563). She continues to beg and complain that it wasn’t fair and that it is not right. Even her friends and neighbors finally get so aggravated with her that they go on to say, “Be a good sport, Tessie… All of us took the same chance.” (Jackson 562), despite the fact that they themselves will kill her in a few moments. Jackson also uses her late arrival to foreshadow the fact that she will be the one sacrificed later on. Tessie’s mood is the only mood that changes from an “everyday” mood to a “life changing” mood. This makes the reader feel as though no one cares for Tessie, as it creates a sense of horror as well.In conclusion, more and more readers will begin to recognize “The Lottery” as a horror story. It has a contradicting plot that leaves a reader horrified and shocked in the end. literary devices such as withheld knowledge, irony, and characterization play a big role in creating a sense of horror in Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery.”This is a really good essay, because I am an insane editor, its what i do as a job at my college’s tutoring center. Some basic recommendations would be to use 2 spaces after each sentence and add more descriptive detail to add some spice. You did jump around a little, so you may want to smooth your transitions. Great job on the grammar though! be careful about passive voice. 🙂
Someone sent me this email and I think it’s a scam…?
Q: GHAYTH FAIZA WATSON.23, Hawley Crescent,Camden Town, London,NW1 8NP, England. Here writes Ghayth Faiza, suffering from cancerousailment. I am married to Watson Ghayth an Arabian who isdead. My husband was intoprivate practice all his life before his death.Our life together as man and wife lasted for three decadeswithout a child. My husband died after a protractedillness. My husband and I made a vow to uplift thedown-trodden and the less-privileged individuals as he hadpassion for persons who can not help themselves due tophysical disability or financialpredicament. I can adduce this to the fact that he needed a Child fromthis relationship, which never came.When my late husband was alive he deposited the sum of TwoMillion Great Britain Pounds Sterling which were derivedfrom his vast estates and investment in capital marketwith his bank here in UK. Presently, this money is stillwith the Bank. Recently, my Doctor told me that I havelimited days to live due to the cancerous problems I amsuffering from.Though what bothers me most is the strokethat I havein addition to the cancer. With this hardreality that hasbefallen my family and i,I have decided to donate thisfund to you and want you to use this gift which comes frommy husbands effort to fund the upkeep of widows, widowers,orphans, destitute, the down-trodden, physicallychallenged children, barren-women and persons who prove tobe genuinely handicapped financially. It is often said that blessed is the hand that giveth. Itook this decision because I do not have any child thatwill inherit this money and my husband relatives arebourgeois and very wealthy persons and I do not want myhusband’s hard earned money to be misused or invested intoill perceived ventures. I do not want a situation wherethis money will be used in an ungodly manner, hence thereason for taking this bold decision. I am not afraid ofdeath hence I know where I am going.I know that I am goingto be with the Almighty when I eventually pass on. It isoften said that blessed is the hand that giveth. I tookthis decision because I do not have any child thatwill inherit this money and my husband relatives arebourgeois and very wealthy persons and I do not want myhusband’s hard earned money to be misused or invested intoill perceived ventures. I do not want a situation wherethis money will be used in an ungodly manner, hence thereason for taking this bold decision. I am not afraid ofdeath hence I know where I am going. I know that I am going to be with the Almighty when Ieventually pass on. The Almighty will fight my case and Ishall hold my peace. I do not need any telephonecommunication in this regard due to my deterioratinghealth and because of the presence of my husband’srelatives around me.I do not want them to know about thisdevelopment. With God all things are possible.As soon as I receive your reply I shall give you thecontact of the bank in UK. I will also issue you a Letterof Authority that will empower you as the originalbeneficiary of this fund. My happiness is that I lived alife worthy of emulation. Please always be prayerful allthrough your life. Please assure me that you will act just as I have statedherein. Hope to hear from you soon and God bless you andmembers of your family. Reply to my mail address:[email protected] Faithfully in ChristGhayth Faiza watson. Should I bother replying to this? I’m pretty sure it’s a scam, but what do you all think?
A: Delete it. Why did you bother reading it in the first place?
What is wrong with addiction?
Q: I obviously need to give you a little more context about a question like that. What im asking is what is so wrong with being addicted to something? We are addicted to water, oxygen, nitrogen, sodium, and so many other things in life that if we stopped maintaining our addictions to we would die very quickly.Why then is it that so many people get so upset and bent out of shape when someone has an addiction to a drug? If you take away all of the negative problems like stealing for the drugs, gang violence, drug lords, etc by legalizing the drug, what is left that is so terrible about say Morphine? People with cancer take morphine regularly , day after day after day in large doses, sometimes for decades, or longer. They are not feeling any negative effects from that drug besides they are out of pain, possibly even having some euphoria, and get to live their lives as normally as possible until their cancer is cured or they die. People prescribed oxycontin for similar chronic pain are doing the same. There is little to no physical harm in taking these opiates but if you are labeled an addict people look at you differently, they think you’re going to beat them up for $5 and corrupt their kids or something.And then on the other hand you have people addicted to cigarettes that drink heavily but look down on someone that does heroin, even though alcohol and cigarette addiction kills many many times that which heroin kills. There are also the people that drink 6 cans of caffeinated soda, coffee, or energy drinks every day and think they are not drug addicts by definition and look down on other types of drug addicts like they’re lepers or something. See what happens what those people stop getting their caffeine fix and they get massive headaches and body aches from the withdrawal.I’d like to hear some opinions about this question, but again, let me make it clear that i am asking solely about the addiction, NOT ABOUT ANYTHING RELATED to addiction like violence resulting from stealing to get the substance, because that can be avoided by making the drug cheap and easily obtained, that type of violence is a result of its illegality, not the drug itself.I am also NOT talking about an addiction to anything that causes GREAT PHYSICAL HARM to a person like meth, alcohol, etc. I personally am ok with someone drinking themselves to death as long as they don’t hurt anyone else, but i can easily understand why others would not be ok with this type of addiction. Non-harmful addictions like morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, fentanyl, and psychological addictions to drugs like marijuana, MDMA(ecstasy), and others.I am also not concerned with things like hitting someone because you were on meth or drinking alcohol. Just as the courts do not believe being drunk is an excuse for doing those acts, neither do i. The alcohol does not make you hit your wife, you chose to do that. The meth may have made you paranoid and delusional, but you chose to attack that person. Opiates of course have no history of abusing people under their influence so again id like to focus on opiates and similar drugs and avoid alcohol and meth and that type of drug.Summary – What is wrong with being addicted to substances that do not make you violent if they are free and easily obtained and do not cause physical harm to the user? Drugs or substances like opiates that can be taken long term with little to no negative effects on the health of the user and do not cause them to attack others.I understand laws like DUI laws, etc that prohibit people from driving or operating machines while under the influence. I am solely talking about what is wrong with addiction to the above type of drug, when used responsibly and safely in your own home, just as people drink alcohol “responsibly” or smoke cigarettes today.Couple more points to the people answering:Overdosing – Not a serious problem with proper education, quality production of the substance, and responsible use. People that overdose fall into certain categories:1) Accidental overdose – avoidable with education, responsible use, doctor supervision of dosage increase.2)Suicide – has nothing to do with the drug or should we start illegalizing rope as well because people hang themselves?3) Product was much stronger than they were use to – again, avoidable with quality control of production through legalization.We allow people to obtain alcohol legally even though you can potentially overdose. The government allows people to be responsible with certain very dangerous chemicals on their own, but not with others.Also – if you don’t like the use of water as an addicted substance example, use firefighters rescuing children, or the high doctors get from saving patients, or cops fighting “bad guys” or love of hobbies. all of these things create a dopamine or serotonin reaction in your brain that is easy to become addicted to yet is perfectly ok in society. Morphine gives the dopamine response without doing the action. Ecstasy gives the serotonin response without the action.As the first answerer said, everyone is addicted to something, and that was what i was trying to bring across.Definition – “addiction is a state in which the body relies on a substance for normal functioning and develops physical dependence. When this substance is suddenly removed, it will cause withdrawal, a characteristic set of signs and symptoms”this fits the bill for water, sodium, and the other substances we need to live and if taken away will cause withdrawal and death just as with a heavy addiction to certain drugs.I would rather email you daisy, but here it is:drugs causing unhealthy coping mechanisms? in fact the drugs i am talking about (opiates) use the bodies natural dopamine receptors to create a sensation that is the same released when doing a good deed. firefighters use this to get past the horror of the job. people are fine with this type of usage but are completely against it when its gotten through an outside substance. firefighters and other similar rescue workers can easily become addicted to this rush but are looked up to.you also claim i am trivializing oxycontin addiction when i did no such thing. instead you are taking your own personal feelings and throwing them at me for a perceived wrong. my own mother uses oxycontin to control her chronic pain, but i also feel if someone choose to use oxycodone to control mental anguish why are they not allowed? we let people destroy their lives with alcohol and even advertise for it, but illegal drugs are wrong?
A: were all addicted to something
People also view

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *