What does AIDs do to you in the long run

Health related question in topics Conditions Illness .We found some answers as below for this question “What does AIDs do to you in the long run”,you can compare them.

Diseases like Pneumonia, TB, some specific cancers, fatigue, vision loss, brain damage are commonly occurrences among AIDS patients. Death results eventually if these infections (called “opportunistic” infections) are unchecked. [ Source: http://www.chacha.com/question/what-does-aids-do-to-you-in-the-long-run ]
More Answers to “What does AIDs do to you in the long run
What does AIDs do to you in the long run
Diseases like Pneumonia, TB, some specific cancers, fatigue, vision loss, brain damage are commonly occurrences among AIDS patients. Death results eventually if these infections (called “opportunistic” infections) are unchecked.
How long is the AIDS Walk and Run?
The walk is 2 miles and takes roughly 40 minutes to one hour to complete. The run is 5 kilometers (3.1 miles) and takes 30-45 minutes to finish.
How long do button cells for hearing aids last before they run do…?
This depends on the type and usage of the hearing aid. On a 12 hours/day “on” and a 12 hours/day “off” regime, the “ZincAir Top 675” button cell (IEC: PR44) provides enough energy to operate a hearing aid for t…

Related Questions Answered on Y!Answers

Anyone know if it is more harmful to take anti-anxiety meds or sleep aids than to deal with stress naturally?
Q: If you have been diagnosed with an anxiety disorder, and also have great difficulty sleeping … do you think the meds cause more damage to your body, or do you think by not taking the meds to reduce anxiety and help your body sleep, that the stress would cause more harm to the body in the long run?Does it make more sense to get a good night’s sleep and feel healthy, rather than irritable and unable to concentrate?Aside from the dangers of addiction to meds of course, what do you think is more healthy? With or without meds?
A: Benzodiazepines (Valium, Ativan, Xanax, etc) are among the least toxic medications out there, so unless you’re allergic to them, there’s almost no chance they’ll directly hurt your body. With all medications, there’s a question of whether the benefits outweigh the risks. The only major risk with benzos is addiction. But it’s statistically impossible to get addicted if you’re only using them as needed. Bottom line: if taking them twice a week or so improves the quality of a person’s life, there should be no problems with it.However, most doctors don’t understand this. It’s really unfair that some doctors out there will readily prescribe dangerous drugs like antipsychotics and mood stabilizers to people who need those, but refuse to give benzos to people with anxiety. There’s nothing wrong with needing to take anxiety meds, so don’t ever let anyone make you feel guilty over it and find a doctor who will prescribe them.
Should the government provide businesses with financial incentives to stimulate the economy?
Q: With the world that we live in today, and the economy, I don’t think providing businesses with grants, incentives, or any type of financial aid would be bennificial in the long run. What do you think?
A: Not necessarily write them checks but allow them to make money by reducing the taxes they pay, creating an electrical supply, water supply and roads to ship and bring workers to their facility.Do you realize how much a city, a state and the federal government taxes them? What is the incentive to even bother?EDIT- on that note after I add up all the taxes I pay it roughly equals 65% of what I make. WHAT IS THE INCENTIVE FOR ME TO WORK. !@#$%^ FOKKERT
Long article about Charles Krauthammer, journalist……what do you think of this ?
Q: GOD BLESS AMERICACharles KrauthammerMy friend went to hear Charles Krauthammer. He listened with 25 others in a closed room. What he says here, is NOT 2nd-hand but 1st. You would do well to read and pass this along to EVERYBODY that loves his country. This is VERY serious for the direction of our country. The ramifications are staggering for us and our children.Charles Krauthammer Speech/Comments on the ‘New Economy’ and Barack Obama’To my friends and associates:Last Monday was a profound evening, hearing Dr. Charles Krauthammer speak to the Center for the American Experiment. He is a brilliant intellectual, seasoned and articulate. He is forthright and careful in his analysis, and never resorts to emotions or personal insults. He is NOT a fearmonger nor an extremist in his comments and views. He is a fiscal conservative, and has a Pulitzer Prize for writing. He is a frequent contributor to Fox News and writes weekly for the Washington Post. The entire room was held spellbound during his talk. I have shared this with many of you and several have asked me to summarize his comments, as we are living in uncharted waters economically and internationally. Even 2 democrats at my table agreed with everything he said! If you feel like forwarding this to those who are open minded and have not ‘drunk the Kool-Aid’, feel free.A summary of his comments:1. Mr. Obama is a very intellectual, charming individual. He is not to be underestimated. He is a ‘cool customer’ who doesn’t show his emotions. It’s very hard to know what’s ‘behind the mask’. Taking down the Clinton dynasty from a political neophyte was an amazing accomplishment. The Clintons still do not understand what hit them. Obama was in the perfect place at the perfect time.2. Obama has political skills comparable to Reagan and Clinton. He has a way of making you think he’s on your side, agreeing with your position, while doing the opposite. Pay no attention to what he SAYS; rather, watch what he DOES!3. Obama has a ruthless quest for power. He did not come to Washington to make something out of himself, but rather to change everything, including dismantling capitalism. He can’t be straightforward on his ambitions, as the public would not go along. He has a heavy hand and wants to ‘level the playing field’ with income redistribution and punishment of the achievers of society. He would like to model the USA to Great Britain or Canada .4. His three main goals are to control ENERGY, PUBLIC EDUCATION, and NATIONAL HEALTHCARE by the Federal Government. He doesn’t care about the auto or financial services industries, but got them as an early bonus. The cap and trade will add costs to everything and stifle growth. Paying for FREE college education is his goal. Most scary is healthcare program, because if you make it FREE and add 46,000,000 people to a Medicare-type single-payer system, the costs will go thru the roof. The only way to control costs is with massive RATIONING of services, like in Canada . God forbid.5. He’s surrounded himself with mostly far-left academic types, none of which around him has ever run even a candy store. But they’re going to try and run the auto, financial, banking and other industries. This obviously can’t work in the long run. Obama’s not a socialist; rather a far-left secular progressive bent on nothing short of revolution. He ran as a moderate, but will govern from the hard left. Again, watch what he does, not what he says.6. Obama doesn’t really see himself as President of the USA , more as a ruler over the world. He sees himself above it all, trying to orchestrate and coordinate various countries and their agendas. He sees moral equivalency in all cultures. His apology tour in Germany and England was a prime example of how he sees America , as an imperialist nation that has been arrogant, rather than a great noble nation that has at times made errors. This is the 1st President ever who has chastised our allies and appeased our enemies at the same time!7. He’s now handing out goodies. He hopes that the bill (and pain) will not ‘come due’ until after he’s reelected in 2012. He’d like to blame all problems on Bush from the past and hopefully his successor in the future. He has a huge ego and Mr. Krauthammer believes he is a narcissist.8. Republicans are in the wilderness for a while, but will emerge strong. We’re ‘pining’ for another Reagan, but there’ll never be another like him. He believes Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty and Bobby Jindahl (except for his terrible speech in February) are the future of the party. Newt Gingrich is brilliant, but has baggage. Sarah Palin is sincere and intelligent, but needs to really be seriously boning up on facts and info if she’s to be a serious candidate in the future. We need to return to the party of lower taxes, smaller government, personal responsibility, strong national defense, and states’ rights.9. The current level of spending is ir
A: Krauthammer is a very wise, educated, thoughtful and astute political analyst as his credentials indicate.We really need to pay attention to his words in these times.
People also view

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *