What is the definition of learned behavior and an example

What is the definition of learned behavior?

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_definition_of_learned_behavior

behavior that is taught or acquired through experience

Related Questions Answered on Y!Answers

i need help about the definition of learning? ?

Q: i’ve read it some but i don’t fully understand! can you please discuss this in a simple way and give example? heres the definitionlearning is a process by which behavior is either modified or changed through experience or trainingthanks

A: I used to chew gum while walking. While walking and chewing gum I would bite my tongue. I stopped chewing gum while walking.

Do you think that computers can learn?

Q: Here is a dictionary definition of ‘learning’ :1.knowledge acquired by systematic study in any field of scholarly application.2.the act or process of acquiring knowledge or skill.3. Psychology. the modification of behavior through practice, training, or experience.I would argue that computers can learn. For example, with predictive texting on mobile phones, words that you use more often will come up first. They seem to have learnt from your previous behaviour and adapted to it.This is also the same with searches on the internet, specific advertising ( I see alot of adverts on facebook, myspace etc for music products because it has picked up that I am a musician) and settings on your computer.What do you think?

A: How is acquiring knowledge different from acquiring data?The act of data acquisition would be equivalentArtificial Life, as it is called does NOTHING BUT modify it’s behavior through practice training or input. Robotics has been using AL for 20 YEARS ALREADY!If you mean CAN COMPUTERS THINK, the answer is NO. But they do the stuff you are asking about CONSTANTLY.

I have an assignment due in psychology monday and would like help on this.?

Q: I need to write out a definition of Negative Reinforcement in my own words and then describe it in a real life example. I also need to make sure to state why it’s Negative Reinforcement and then identify the behavior being reinforced and the reinforcer. My answer is below. Is this correct?Negative Reinforcement is removing an undesirable stimulus or action by using a reinforcer (consequences for behavior) which increases the behavior to remove that stimulus. My real life example is:An Experiment with a rat in a cage that when the rat receives a small shock it has to push down on a small bar to stop the shock. Upon learning the correlation between the two the rat goes directly to the bar once being shocked to turn it off. It is Negative Reinforcement because the annoying stimulus gets removed once the rat pushes down on the small bar and the response is stronger due to the rat knowing the correlation. The behavior being reinforced is pressing down the small bar and the reinforcer is the shock.

A: Yes, that is correct. However, I would reword stimulus to be consequence. It is a subtle difference, but it captures the fact that rewards and punishments occur as a result of the behavior.Negative reinforcement is the removal of an undesirable or unpleasant consequence, which increases the likelihood that the organism will repeat the behavior that leads to the elimination of whatever is unpleasant.You have a great example, but it is not situation that would come up in everyday life very often. A situation where negative reinforcement is used very commonly is nagging. Often friends or family will nag and bug you if you do not do something like pick up after yourself, study, or eat only food that belongs to you (i.e., eating other people’s food). When you start to pick up after yourself, study, or eat only your own food the nagging stops. This is a negative reinforcer because nagging is in fact very unpleasant if you have ever been the focus of nagging. When you do the desired behavior the nagging is removed. This should lead to more picking up, studying, or eating your own food.If you stick with the rat example I would substitute correlation with connection. In science the word correlation can have a very specific meaning, which does not necessarily fit with the context you provided.