Why do I always make bad decisions
A lot of times, bad decisions are the result of not thoroughly thinking things through. Perhaps you need to think before you act. [ Source: http://www.chacha.com/question/why-do-i-always-make-bad-decisions ]
More Answers to “Why do I always make bad decisions“
- Why do people always make bad desisions?
- because we were born with things called reason and choice. and it all depends on environment ur in, ur life, who you hang with, what mood ur in, and how you deal with things. it’s different for every human being on why they make bad decisio…
- Why does someone always make bad decisions when the know its wron…?
- Some people are just so self centered and blissfully unaware that their decisions are effecting not only their self but everyone around them. Bad habits are hard to break and no self control doesn’t help much either. Some people can’t even …
- Did Abraham Lincoln make any bad decisions?
- sure he did at first. he thought that he was superior to others but eventually got over it.
Related Questions Answered on Y!Answers
- Why does someone always make bad decisions when the know its wrong?
- Q: Why does a person make bad decisions when they know its wrong and they know it is going to hurt themselves, their family, friends, etc… in the long run or the short run?
- A: Some people are just so self centered and blissfully unaware that their decisions are effecting not only their self but everyone around them. Bad habits are hard to break and no self control doesn’t help much either. Some people can’t even tell right from wrong, that may be another story.
- why does imtiaz always make bad decisions?
- Q: he gets frustrated sometimes when he reiterates what he wants.
- A: Imtiaz is a very complex character that has no idea that drugs are bad for his decision making process. I suggest he watch the movie “American Gangster” or “Blow” to help further elaborate this point. And I am guessing , him getting frustrated is due to the lack of sexual activity he has because he is just not man enough. I also think Darshan , who was a guiding beacon of light in his life has stopped caring.
- why good leaders make bad decisions?
- Q: its a case for strategic management class, MBA prog. level, 4 question to answer: 1- How decisions add or destroy value in organization? 2- provide at least 2 examples of bad decisions in business context and why they occurred?3- do you agree with the author that (group decision making) is always better than individual decision making? provide arguments and facts (you may use references).4- any new thoughts/opinions about the case?
- A: 1-Decisions can be in three categories: adding, removing, and replacing. In the first case, the decision maker adds something new, which could either add value if it’s useful or destroy value if it’s wasteful and irrelevant.In the second case, the decision maker removes something the organization has, thus either removing value if the thing in question was productive, or adding value if it was wasteful and hindered performance.In the final case, replacement, one could replace something with something more valuable, thus increasing overall value, or with something less valuable, possibly wasteful, thus decreasing value.2-Let’s say a factory manager decides to throw away a broken-down machine instead of fixing it, halfway during its depreciation life, and replace it with a brand new machine. The cost of repair would be more favorable than the cost of a new machine, since the broken machine has some additional value to give.Another example would be adding harsher, stricter rules in the code of conduct of office employees. They would have to go through more loopholes to get seemingly straightforward tasks done, and would eventually slow them down and reduce the bottom line of the company.3-Many times, ideas would be bastardized from their original intentions when more than one person gets their hands on it. In this case, good ideas could become less efficient with group decisions. On the flipside, bad ideas needs a group to discuss and review it, in order to either reject or modify it, lest a wasteful decision is implemented. In either case, waiting for the verdict of a group could be time consuming, crippling some other decisions from being made in time.4-Individuals usually make decisions with the best intentions, but they build it on what they do know. This is limiting and could lead to disaster due to the lack of access to critical information. I think having an individual review the decision with a group after studying available information and before implementation would be the best idea. That way, other people in the loop will have to cite and confirm any missing information that could impact the decision.